· 6 min read
Center-weighted and matrix metering patterns
How camera meters average a scene with center-weighted and multi-zone matrix patterns, where each fails, and when an exposure override is warranted.
Written in by Simon Lehmann Editor
A reflected-light meter reads one number: an average luminance the instrument assumes should be rendered as a mid-tone. That single reading says nothing about where the darkest and brightest parts of a scene will land on the film. The calculator dials of the Weston Master series addressed this directly. Rather than printing only a recommended shutter-and-aperture pair, they engraved the working limits of the negative onto the dial itself, turning a point measurement into a small exposure system.
The Weston Master line began with the model 715 (sometimes called the Universal) in the United States in 1939, with British production by Sangamo Weston following in 1951. The lineage ran through the Master II (model 735, 1945), the Master III (737, 1956), the Master IV (745, 1960) and the Master V (748, 1963). The proprietary Weston speed rating that all of these dials referenced traced back further still, to William Nelson Goodwin Jr. and the Weston model 617 photoelectric meter introduced in 1932.
Every Master used a selenium photocell. Selenium is photovoltaic: the cell generates its own electric current in proportion to the light falling on it, driving a galvanometer needle without any battery. The cost of that self-sufficiency is poor sensitivity in dim light, which is why the Master carries a hinged baffle to switch between high and low light ranges, and why the dial includes a mark to bias exposure upward for dark subjects. The needle pointed to a light-value figure on an arc, and that figure was transferred to the rotating calculator dial.
The distinctive feature of the dial is a set of latitude marks flanking the main arrow. There are four, not the two that get remembered: U, A, C and O.
The outer pair define the working envelope. The instruction books state that “the ‘U’ and ‘O’ positions on the Calculator Dial show the recommended limits of subject brightness, the ratio of these being 128:1,” and that for a given dial setting “all objects whose light values fall on or between these two limits will be correctly exposed.” The inner pair are adjustments: the A position sits one stop below the arrow and halves exposure for flat, low-contrast scenes such as fog; the C position sits one stop above and doubles exposure for high-contrast scenes with important deep shadow. C is the practical answer to selenium’s dim-light weakness. Together the four marks meant the dial encoded not one recommendation but a small vocabulary of exposure decisions.
The geometry is worth deriving rather than asserting. Place the main arrow at the centre of Zone V, the mid-grey a reflected reading assumes. On the dial the U mark sits four stops below the arrow, at the centre of Zone I, and the O mark sits three stops above it, at the centre of Zone VIII. The arrangement is asymmetric: four down and three up.
That asymmetry is the whole story. Four stops plus three stops is seven stops, and seven stops is a ratio of 2^7, which is 128. That is exactly the 128:1 the instruction books print. Had the marks been symmetric at four and four, the span would be 2^8, or 256:1. The published ratio is direct evidence for where the marks actually sit.
Suppose you are photographing a stone archway with a dark doorway in shadow and a sunlit wall beside it. Meter the doorway and rotate the dial so that its light value falls at U. The dial now reads, say, f/16 at 1/60. The doorway is anchored at Zone I, just-textured black, and any tone four or more stops brighter than it falls at or above O. If the sunlit wall is six stops brighter than the doorway, it lands beyond the 128:1 window entirely, and the manual is candid about the consequence: using U “may involve some sacrifice of detail in the extreme highlights.”
Rotate the dial the other way, placing the sunlit wall at O, and you protect the highlights instead, “but,” as the books note, this “will cause loss of shadow detail.” The doorway now drops below U into untextured black. The dial does not resolve the conflict for you; it shows you the trade and lets you choose which end of the scale to defend. A real general-purpose film has more headroom than this window suggests. Ilford rate HP5 Plus at EI 400/27 for best results, but state usable image quality from EI 400 up to EI 3200 with appropriate development in Ilfotec DD-X or Microphen. The 128:1 mark is the band of correct exposure, not the absolute limit of what the film can record.
Anyone reaching for one of these meters today must watch the speed scale, and the post-war switch is the trap. Meters up to and including the Master III used the proprietary Weston speed rating. The Master IV of 1960 and the Master V of 1963 used the ASA Index instead; the Master IV instruction book refers explicitly to the “Exposure Index number (ASA Index).”
The two scales differ by about a third of a stop, because a Weston speed runs roughly 0.8 times the ASA figure. Weston 80 equals ASA 100; Weston 64 equals ASA 80; Weston 40 equals ASA 50; Weston 100 equals ASA 125. Weston’s own advice, once box speeds standardised on ASA after 1955, was to subtract one third of a stop from the ASA figure when feeding it to an older Weston-rated meter. Set ASA 400 film straight onto a Weston III scale as though Weston and ASA were the same and you will overexpose by a third of a stop.
This is the same reasoning that underlies the Zone System. Ansel Adams was careful about its origin: “the Zone System is not an invention of mine; it is a codification of the principles of sensitometry, worked out by Fred Archer and myself at the Art Center School in Los Angeles, around 1939-40.” Archer (3 December 1889 – 27 April 1963) and Adams were formalising the nineteenth-century sensitometry of Hurter and Driffield, not inventing exposure from nothing. The Weston dial, sold from 1939, was selling the same idea of deliberate placement in hardware at the very moment the system was being named.
The map is close but not exact. With the arrow at Zone V, U at Zone I and O at Zone VIII, rotating a metered shadow to U places it precisely where Zone-System practice would, except that standard Zone-System metering usually places an important shadow on Zone III, not Zone I, opening up two stops from the indicated reading to keep texture in the dark tones. The dial’s anchor is the threshold of detail; the photographer’s habit is to sit a little above it.
More fundamentally, the dial does placement only. It cannot reach the parts Adams and Archer actually added: expansion and contraction development, the N+ and N− adjustments that bend the negative’s contrast to fit the scene, and the control of print density that closes the loop. The Weston Master put the act of placing a tone into the photographer’s hands years before the system was named. It is the precursor, not the equal.
· 6 min read
How camera meters average a scene with center-weighted and multi-zone matrix patterns, where each fails, and when an exposure override is warranted.
· 6 min read
How and when to bracket exposures by full and fractional stops, how to set the spread for film versus digital, and when brackets serve as insurance or as blending source frames.
· 8 min read
How the H&D curve maps log exposure to density, and what its toe, straight-line section, and shoulder reveal about shadow and highlight rendering.
The grainmag companion app
Meter and place your tones without a signal. No account, no internet required — just you, the light, and the grain.